14 March 2006

The Return of Patriarchy


“When the ordinary thought of a highly cultivated people begins to regard ‘having children’ as a question of pro’s and con’s,” Oswald Spengler, the German historian and philosopher, once observed, “the great turning point has come.”

Read more.... from this month's Foreign Policy

If you are a "DINK" (Dual Income No Kids) be warned. By sheer demographics, conservatives will inherit the earth.


a selection from the above article:

That was the lesson King Pyrrhus learned in the third century B.C., when he marched his Greek armies into the Italian peninsula and tried to take on the Romans. Pyrrhus initially prevailed at a great battle at Asculum. But it was, as they say, “a Pyrrhic victory,” and Pyrrhus could only conclude that “another such victory over the Romans and we are undone.” The Romans, who by then were procreating far more rapidly than were the Greeks, kept pouring in reinforcements—“as from a fountain continually flowing out of the city,” the Greek historian Plutarch tells us. Hopelessly outnumbered, Pyrrhus went on to lose the war, and Greece, after falling into a long era of population decline, eventually became a looted colony of Rome.

Like today’s modern, well-fed nations, both ancient Greece and Rome eventually found that their elites had lost interest in the often dreary chores of family life. “In our time all Greece was visited by a dearth of children and a general decay of population,” lamented the Greek historian Polybius around 140 B.C., just as Greece was giving in to Roman domination. “This evil grew upon us rapidly, and without attracting attention, by our men becoming perverted to a passion for show and money and the pleasures of an idle life.” But, as with civilizations around the globe, patriarchy, for as long as it could be sustained, was the key to maintaining population and, therefore, power.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Would one of those "pleasures of an idle life" happen to be the homosexuality which was pervasive in ancient Greece and now is widely referenced as proof of the enlightened state of Greek culture? As even the most die-hard "progressive" would have to agree, homosexuality does not and never has, lead to population growth.

Anonymous said...

Yes. (the idle life) And it would happen again to the Romans.

Population growth is not possible. So what must one do with a genetic aberation, and evolutionary dead-end?
Adopt and corrupt a new generation!!! But, even this is only possible if heterosexuals continue to breed.